Fig. 2. Comparative analysis results of the DEM simulation and experiment: (A) 0.01 m/s pushing velocity of the loading disc; (B) 0.02 m/s pushing velocity of the loading disc; (C) 0.03 m/s pushing velocity of the loading disc. (IMAGE)

Beijing Institute of Technology Press Co., Ltd

Fig. 2. Comparative analysis results of the DEM simulation and experiment: (A) 0.01 m/s pushing velocity of the loading disc; (B) 0.02 m/s pushing velocity of the loading disc; (C) 0.03 m/s pushing velocity of the loading disc.

Caption

Fig. 2. Comparative analysis results of the DEM simulation and experiment: (A) 0.01 m/s pushing velocity of the loading disc; (B) 0.02 m/s pushing velocity of the loading disc; (C) 0.03 m/s pushing velocity of the loading disc.

Credit

Space: Science & Technology

Usage Restrictions

News organizations may use or redistribute this image, with proper attribution, as part of news coverage of this paper only.

License

Licensed content

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.