News Release

Toward standardized antithrombin activity assays: multi-center evaluation and optimization

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Shanghai Jiao Tong University Journal Center

Interlaboratory comparisons of quality control materials

image: 

(A) Comparison of measured values for quality control materials at the 10% level before and after optimization. A-1 to B-2 represent individual participating laboratories; (B) Comparison of measured values for quality control materials at the 15% level before and after optimization. A-1 to B-2 represent individual participating laboratories; (C) Comparison of measured values for quality control materials at the 35% level via two different calibration curves. A-1 to B-4 represent individual participating laboratories. The results obtained via the normal-level calibration curve and the low-level calibration curve are shown for comparison. The data are presented as the means with coefficients of variation, and recovery is expressed as a percentage (%).

ns: no statistically significant difference; *: P<0.05. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

view more 

Credit: Yu Liu, Ying Song,Yu-hua Wang, Zhen-ping Chen, Qiang Li, Run-hui Wu, Jing Sun, Lei Zhang, Xiao-bo Hu, Ren-chi Yang, Xue-feng Wang, Jing Dai.

Antithrombin (AT) is a critical anticoagulant whose deficiency, which is common in many clinical conditions, requires precise management. The multi-center evaluation revealed significant bias and poor reproducibility at AT activity levels below 30%, and some even fail to provide reliable results. In this study, the assay performance for Systems A and B was substantially improved through tailored optimization strategies involving standardized reagent reconstitution, the establishment of low-level calibration curves, and the implementation of low-level quality control. Following optimization, bias at the 15% level was markedly reduced, coefficients of variation were improved, and reproducibility was significantly enhanced. Compared with the measurements before optimization, the low-level material results were closer to the target levels, and the recovery rates were improved. Importantly, the standardized workflow and optimization measures proposed in this study can be translated into a practical laboratory operating guide to support personnel training across laboratories and lay a solid foundation for forming professional guidelines or expert consensuses in the future.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.