What a magic school bus taught us about science education
Grant and Award Announcement
Updates every hour. Last Updated: 1-May-2025 05:08 ET (1-May-2025 09:08 GMT/UTC)
Nearly half of Americans (46%) think the country is headed in the wrong direction when it comes to the incoming president’s policies to lower healthcare costs, while 31% say it’s on the right track, according to the latest West Health-Gallup survey released today.
With Uncle Sam running chronic trillion-dollar deficits, one proposal to increase revenue has been to raise it from the wealthiest Americans: through a tax, not on their yearly income, but on their accumulated wealth.
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., introduced one version of a wealth tax, which would tax net worth over $50 million at 2% and net worth over $1 billion at 3%. But it’s never come to a vote, and critics charge it would reduce gross domestic product, partly by reducing people’s incentives to save money.
But new research from Texas McCombs questions whether wealth taxes reduce savings. Marius Ring, an assistant professor of finance, investigates the real-world effects of a wealth tax in Norway — one of the few countries that currently implements one.
Tree crops – for example, apple, cherry, olives, nuts, coffee, and cacao – cover more than 183 million hectares worldwide, yet remain largely overlooked in agricultural policies, despite their critical role in achieving the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). An international research team, with the participation of Göttingen University, highlight how these crops are not only essential to feed the world and for global economies, but also hold immense potential for protecting biodiversity and the climate, as well as improving livelihoods for millions of people worldwide. The findings were published in a Perspectives article in Nature Sustainability.